Introduction:
Introduction:
The choice of 3D modelling software in the complicated sphere of plant engineering and construction is a determining question. This can affect the efficiency of the project, the integrity of its data, and the asset management over the long term. This space is taken up by two titans: AVEVA Everything3D (E3D) and Intergraph Smart 3D. Although both of them are developed to work with huge, multi-disciplinary projects, they provide different user experiences and data architecture philosophies.
The Evolution of AVEVA E3D:
The Evolution of AVEVA E3D:
The PDMS, which has been the staple of decades of plant design, is replaced by AVEVA E3D, which is one of the successors. E3D was created in order to implement the innovative graphics alongside a more user-friendly interface to the mature PDMS engine. It is also well known as being lightweight in the sense that it does not feel heavy, even though the data that it works with is huge. To further know about it, one can visit the E3D Course. Its capabilities in combining laser scan data with the 3D environment directly have made the software popular among brownfield or revamp projects in which existing structures have to be matched with the new designs.
- Integrated Laser Scanning: It enables real-time clash of the as-built point cloud data.
- User Interface: Has a ribbon-based user interface that makes it much easier to use than older versions.
- Drafting Capabilities: Automatically creates 2D drawings out of the 3D model with great accuracy and the least possible hand cleanup.
- Mobile Access: It supports tablet integration, which enables engineers to take the model into the field very easily.
- Global Collaboration: This applies a multi-database mode where teams in different parts of the world can be working on the same model with low latency.
- Customisation: Extremely customizable with Programmable Macro Language (PML) and.NET API.
Architecture of Intergraph SP3D:
Architecture of Intergraph SP3D:
SmartPlant 3D (SP3D) is an attempt to move toward a more data-centric design approach. As opposed to the traditional CAD system that puts graphics first, SP3D is a rule-based architecture. This implies that the software can know the relationship between components. To take an example, when you change the position of a pump, the piping and support attached can be programmed to change automatically according to some pre-established engineering concepts. Many institutes provide the SP3D Training, and enrolling in them can help you start a promising career in this domain. This simplifies the manual errors, and the design is not built on a project specification.
- Rule-Based Design: The rule-based design provides engineering consistency such that components that are not specified are not placed in the design.
- Relational Database: It is based on either Microsoft SQL or Oracle and thus is powerful in data mining and lifecycle management.
- Automation: Highly automation-capable, with it having a task-based environment.
- Discipline Integration: This is an electrical, piping, HVAC, and structural discipline that functions as one.
- Data Integrity: Since it is also highly integrated with the SmartPlant suite, data is simple to flow between P&IDs and the 3D model.
- Scalability: Built to support large, multi-billion-dollar, "mega-projects" with the design being just as important as the data management.
Conclusion:
Conclusion:
The choice of the best software is purely a matter of the needs of the organisation and the type of work to be finished. AVEVA E3D can be regarded as the more responsive option, especially in the situations of operating the existing facilities or in the situations, when the quick, user-friendly design-to-drawing workflow is needed. This is because it is the gold standard when it comes to renovations due to its capability of managing point clouds. Preparing for the E3D Interview Questions can be a wise choice for your career in this domain. Conversely, SP3D is a giant on large new-build projects, whereby engineering regulations have to be rigidly applied on thousands of miles of piping. Its data-centric view offers a stronger base to the owners who desire the 3D model to serve as a digital twin of the whole lifecycle of the plant. Finally, the E3D excels in user experience and the flexibility of brownfields. Whereas SP3D excels in data-driven automation and specification control.
Attachments
-
E3D.jpeg