Forecasting in Agile always feels a bit fragile. Velocity shifts, scope changes, people go on leave, priorities move. Yet we’re still expected to give confident delivery dates.
Lately I’ve been digging into Monte Carlo Forecasting Agile approaches as an alternative to traditional estimation. Instead of locking onto a single forecast, it uses historical delivery data to run thousands of simulations and produce probability-based outcomes. In theory, that sounds far more aligned with how Agile teams actually work.
What I’m curious about is the practical side:
Lately I’ve been digging into Monte Carlo Forecasting Agile approaches as an alternative to traditional estimation. Instead of locking onto a single forecast, it uses historical delivery data to run thousands of simulations and produce probability-based outcomes. In theory, that sounds far more aligned with how Agile teams actually work.
What I’m curious about is the practical side:
- Are teams really trusting probability ranges over fixed dates?
- What data are you feeding the simulations (cycle time vs throughput)?
- How long did it take stakeholders to “get” the results?